GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, NCT OF DELHI & HARYANA 4TH FLOOR, IFCI ...

The AO accepted this rationale, concluding that the interest expense was a business expenditure under Section 36 (1) (iii) ...

The company and its directors, Chandra Devi Biyala, Anil Kumar Bagri, and Jay Prakash Mukhiya, are required to pay the ...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Kolkata, has set aside a penalty of ₹1 crore imposed on Tarai Transport Corporation ...

The Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Delhi, allowed the appeal filed by Northern Coalfields ...

“An Indian Company engaged in sector/activity prohibited for FDI is permitted to issue bonus shares to its pre-existing non-resident shareholders, provided that the shareholding pattern of the ...

ITAT Chennai held that since income of the assessee is assessed by applying flat gross profit rate of 2% hence provisions of section 40A (3) cannot be invoked. Accordingly, disallowance u/s. 40A (3) ...

3. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner inter alia challenging the Orders-in-Original dated 14 th January, 2025 and 3 rd February, 2025 issued by the Office of the Commissioner, ...

Assessee is an individual whose case was selected for limited scrutiny to examine certain issues. Noticing an increase in closing balance of unsecured loans as compared to previous year, AO made ...

The Delhi High Court addressed a petition by Shalender Kumar challenging orders by the Commissioner, Delhi West CGST Commissionerate, that withheld his GST refund. The petitioner had initially faced ...

Considering the arguments presented, the Rajasthan High Court issued a notice to respondents 1 through 7, with their respective counsels accepting the notice and requesting time for further ...

This appeal by the assessee is filed under Section 66 (1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 for calling in question the order dated 28.03.2024 passed by the respondent herein. 2. The appeal ...